Jump to content
Neighbours Forum - NeighboursFans.com

wizardt™

Contributors
  • Content Count

    18,033
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    212

wizardt™ last won the day on September 26

wizardt™ had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

13,373 Exemplary

4 Followers

About wizardt™

  • Rank
    Script Editor

Information

  • Favourite Neighbours Characters
    Sonya, Toadie, Yashvi, Chloe, NED!!!
  • Quote
    KATE: "What do you want me to do, Chris, put on a Jake Gyllenhaal mask or something?" CHRIS: "Could help..."
  • Favourite Neighbours Season
    1997
  • Gender
    Male
  • Spoilers
    Spoiler Junkie
  • Country
    GB

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    UK
  • Interests
    Acupuncture, anchovies, Anson's Corner, architraves... The list is endless.

Recent Profile Visitors

12,279 profile views
  1. I can't swear by it - I have a feeling it wasn't there in the last board iteration, but it may have been there on previous ones. I'm vague about it because I've always used the tags, but it's not entirely new to me, I think. Or possibly it was there on Back to the Bay but not here?
  2. They don't seem to be working with the brackets/code, but you can highlight the spoilery text and then use the button with the eye icon to put a spoiler box on.
  3. @Rick182 Not sure if this is right, but according to Google: So I'd say that's not a board issue, it's because you're seeing the standard Unicode emoji set in the way they would usually look on your (pre-Windows 10) OS. You can still access an awful lot of non-standard emojis via the 'smiley face' menu at the top of the post preview, as ever (I'm sure these aren't showing for you as black and white):
  4. Me neither! Even better, it's got a quick link to symbols on it, too -- to think, I've still been navigating to Character Map every day and waiting for it to load.
  5. Thanks @Hawker, all looks great to me! One thing I almost asked about (but then found) is that the option to edit posts is now on the top right of the post as one of the options in the 'three dots' menu -- rather than down below as it used to be. Just thought I'd mention in case anyone is looking for it.
  6. In 2008-2009 it was pretty appalling IMO, from the bits I've seen. But I didn't actually watch the show consistently in those years, whereas I did watch all of 1995. However I was probably less discerning at that age!
  7. It is, but at least we UK-ers can still respond to points made after the Aus airing, even though the original posters might've long forgotten those episodes by the time we get to them!
  8. Thanks Sal. I think that's the right approach, as it would be a shame to split the episode discussion altogether; discussion has been a lot more active on those parts of the boards since the UK and Australia have been airing in sync.
  9. Thanks to your noble sacrifices, now nobody ever need watch 1995 again.
  10. Emoji codes -- : lol : etc -- seem to be suddenly loading very quickly, whereas prior to the server switch they'd become quite sluggish and often didn't load (at least for me), so that might also be a good sign.
  11. Thanks, Sal! Don't want to jinx it, but it felt like some weight 'lifted' about two minutes ago and it is suddenly loading very quickly.
  12. Thanks for your all your efforts, Sal! Don't know it helps for us to post 'symptoms' but the thing I'm getting a lot of is bare-bones, Times New Roman loading: Also quite a few link clicks that don't register, and not being able to type in reply boxes etc. It had been better today than it was yesterday but seems to have taken a bit of a dip again. When I've had problems similar to this in the past with websites I've worked on after a server switch, I seem to recall the web server folk I called up on the phone to sort it out saying the PHP version was to blame. But
  13. Just letting you know I think a scene may have been cut from the UK version of 6829.

    1. wizardt™

      wizardt™

      Okay... why me? :D And which scene?

       

      ETA: Sorry Ruby, I realise now from your post in the episode thread that you mean 8289 (rather than 6829) which is my episode. I'll take a look when I come to summarise. :)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Guidelines Privacy Policy